Kedudukan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas untuk Mengubah Perilaku Peserta Didik
Abstract
The rationale for this research stems from the presence of tangible issues that manifest inside the educational setting. These challenges necessitate instructors to engage in research in order to design a study that examines how classroom action research may effectively address and resolve concerns within the educational setting. The objective of this study is to investigate the positioning of Classroom Action Research in the context of modifying student behavior. The present study employs a qualitative research methodology. The utilized data source consists of secondary data obtained through a literature review methodology. This study employs diverse data collection approaches that draw upon a range of literature sources. The findings of this study demonstrate the crucial role that Classroom Action Research (CAR) plays in facilitating the modification of student behavior within the educational setting. PTK offers teachers the chance to actively engage in ongoing enhancement within the classroom setting. In order to facilitate the identification of the elements that exert effect on student behavior, it is imperative for educators to possess the necessary knowledge and skills. The implementation of Classroom Action Research (CAR) provides educators with a comprehensive understanding of both desired and undesired student behavior, while also fostering increased student engagement in the process of behavior modification.
References
Creswell, JW. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4thed). Boston: Pearson Education
Bisri, H., & Bisri, H. (2022). Students’ Perceptions, Interests, and Motivation of Tahfîdz al-Qur’ân and Tafaqquh fî al-Dîn in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 167-184. doi:10.36667/jppi.v9i2.903
Ainusyamsi, F., & Husni, H. (2021). Perspektif Al-Qur’an tentang Pembebasan Manusia melalui Pendidikan Akhlak. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 51-62. doi:10.36667/jppi.v9i1.670
Daryanto. (2006). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Penelitian Tindakan Sekolah Beserta Contoh- Contohnya. Yogyakarta : Gava Media., 18.
Goe, L., Holdheide, L., & Miller, T. (2014). Practical Guide to Designing Comprehensive Teacher Evaluation Systems. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher …, (February). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED520828
Kusuma, I. D., & Darmawan, E. (2019). Integration of STAD with Mind mapping to Enhanced Student Cognitive Through Classroom Action Research. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31002/ijobe.v2i2.2046
McKernan, J. (1986). The countenance of curriculum action research. Irish Educational Studies, 6(1), 17–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0332331860060106
Meo, L., Weu, G., & BS, Y. N. (2021). PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR IPA PADA SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 8(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v8i1.101
Murati, R. (2015). The Role of the Teacher in the Educational Process. The Online Journal of New Horizon in Education, 5(2), 75–78.
Rohita. (2021). Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Panduan Praktis Untuk Mahasiswa Dan Guru. Deepublish (p. 99). Deepublish Publisher. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625
Sanjaya, Prof. Dr. H. W. (2016). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Fenomena (Vol. 6, p. 164). prenada Media.
Tsauri, S. (2015). Pendidikan Karakter: Peluang Dalam Membangun Karakter Bangsa. IAIN Jember Press (p. 132).
Wangdi, T., & Namgyel, S. (2022). Classroom to Reduce Student Disruptive Behavior: An Action Research. Mextesol Journal, 46(1).