Author Guidelines

JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM

JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on Islamic education. JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM publishes two times a year since 2012. JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM aims to provide readers with a better understanding of Islamic education around the world through the publication either conceptual or field reports. The articles should be original, unpublished and not under reviewed for possible publication in any other journals. All submitted manuscripts will be blindly-reviewed by qualified academics in the field. This process may take several weeks or months.

Articles should be written in English, Indonesia, or Arabic between 7.000-15.000 words including text, all tables and figures, notes, references, and appendices. Any contributors must follow template manuscript provided by JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM. It can be accessed at JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM website.

Submitted manuscripts should have relevance and contribute something to Islamic education. The manuscripts should include 150 words of abstracts (each in English and Indonesia), Introduction, Methods, Results (findings), Discussion, Conclusion, and References.  Contributors from outside Indonesia may send abstract in English or Arabic only.

The article that will be submitted in this journal should contain:

• Title: no more than 16 words; 
• Author(s) name: is fully written without any title;
• Institution: is completely stated the institution name; 
• Corresponding author: includes name & email address
• Abstract: The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. The abstract should provide a brief introduction to the problem, objective of paper, followed by a statement regarding the methodology and a brief summary of results. The abstract should end with a comment on the significance of the results or a brief conclusion. Abstracts are written in 11 pt Times New Roman, preferably not more than 250 words.
• Introduction: In introduction, authors should state the objectives of the work at the end of introduction section. Before the objective, Authors should provide an adequate background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing solutions/method, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what do you hope to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results.
• Methods: Methods should make readers be able to reproduce the research. Provide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference: Only relevant modifications should be described. Do not repeat the details of established methods.
• Results and Discussion: Results should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers. The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature. In discussion, it is the most important section of your article. Here you get the chance to sell your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a brief summary of the main scientific findings (not experimental results). The following components should be covered in discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what)? Do you provide interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences?
• Conclusion: Conclusions should answer the objectives of research. Tells how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. Without clear conclusions, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge the work, and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. Do not repeat the abstract, or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You should also suggest future experiments and/or point out those that are underway.
• References

Book by one author: (Brophy, 1995, p. 54)

Brophy, R. J. (1995). Robinson Jeffers: Dimensions of a Poet. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

Book with two authors (Werther & Davis, 1993, p. 123)

Werther, W. B., Jr. & Davis, K. (1993). Human Resources and Personnel Management (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Book with three to five authors First in-text citation (Edginton, Hudson, & Lankford, 2001, p. 45); subsequent citations (Edington et al., 2001, p. 45)

Edginton, C. R., Hudson, S. D., & Lankford, S. V. (2001). Managing Recreation, Parks, and Leisure Services: An Introduction. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.

Multiple books, same author  (Brophy, 1973, p. 45) (Brophy, 1995, p. 56)

Brophy, R. J. (1973). Robinson Jeffers: Myth, Ritual, and Symbol in His Narrative Poems. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University Press.

Brophy, R. J. (1995). Robinson Jeffers: Dimensions of a Poet. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

Edited book  (Nuwer, 2004, p. 23)

Nuwer, H. (Ed.). (2004). The Hazing Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Chapter in an edited book (Arnold, 2004, pp. 60-85)

Arnold, J. C. (2004). Hazing and Alcohol in a College Fraternity. In H. Nuwer (Ed.), The Hazing Reader (pp. 51-105). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Book with a corporate author First in-text citation (World Tourism Organization [WTO], 2003, p. 34); subsequent citations (WTO, 2003, p. 34)

World Tourism Organization. (2003). MICE Outbound Tourism 2000. Madrid, Spain: Author.

Journal (William, 2008, p.45)

Williams, J. H. (2008). Employee engagement: Improving participation in safety. Professional Safety, 53(12), 40-45.

Conference Proceeding (Clancey, 2011)

Clancey, W.J. (2011). Communication, Simulation, and In-telligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 556-560. Menlo Park, Calif.: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Inc. 

Report (Rice, 2014)

Rice, J. (2014). Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving, Technical Report, KSL-86-19, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford Univ. 

Thesis (Clancey, 2013, p. 49)

Clancey, W.J. (2013). Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue. PhD Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University.

Website (Ivey, 2012)

Ivey, K.C. (2 September 2012). Citing Internet sources URL http://www.eei- alex.com/eye/utw/96aug.html. 

It is suggested the use of a reference manager, MENDELEY  

The article should also use a body-note format of citation.